£3.73 wrote:Independent Scotland ? Do you even watch world events ?
Independent from what ?
Westminster?
Well that would be a positive start. It's logical to suggest that Scotland's interest would be served better from Edinburgh than that other place. Independent to make our own economic priorities, independent to make decisions regarding wars in foreign lands, personally I've had my fill of Labour Prime Ministers and Tories, using our children as cannon fodder.
I'm sick to death of the blatant sight of deprived people here in Scotland, it goes against any moral grain that we Scots may salvage, through the act of independence.
£3.73 wrote:Do none of you really get it ?
It doesn't matter who you vote for.
The SNP are as establishment as any other party.
Once again, it does not matter who you vote for, you will get exactly the same series of events bar a few cosmetic differences.
Yes your correct the SNP lost all creditability, when they made that fatal jump from a broad based political movement, to a political party. However what they offer is that first step, as far as I'm concerned they should disband as soon as independence is achieved. They are their to be used, afteral they
all use us.
£3.73 wrote:Argyll SHOULD be fielding someone from Argyll, who will speak for the electorate of Argyll, and fight to get the best deal for Argyll. As should every other constituency ! That is the only way to take politics back. (and that will never happen), why, because it would be a lot harder for the real powers that be to rope in 500 independents.Also each candidate should only be allowed a single term. As is, we have this arse backwards system where outsiders are telling us what's good for Argyll !
Absolutely correct it will never happen, unless their is some catalyst event. Scotland voting through the SNP would be such an event, it would constitute a constitutional crisis in Britain. I would go further, the 500 hundred should be picked randomly by computer, they should willingly serve for one term ( people should be given the choice ) these candidates should and would be directly accountable to community councils. In fact they would not be able to open their mouths without the consent of their constituents.
Dependence ...ffs !