bill wrote:Govangirl wrote:bill wrote:Never ever liked him.I know he did a lot of charity work,but there was just some thing about him made me uneasy.
No doubt it was because he was once a miner. Your idol wouldn't have liked him either.
RIP Sir Jimmy and well done for the £40million you raised for charity.
I stick by what I said at the time of his death.I see others have changed their tune.
LANDROVER ROGER wrote:Martin has raised the same point with regard to compensation that I tried to make earlier in the thread.I was severely slapped down for it.Ah well.
EMDEE wrote:LANDROVER ROGER wrote:Martin has raised the same point with regard to compensation that I tried to make earlier in the thread.I was severely slapped down for it.Ah well.
Exactly what I thought.
I've also been wondering about the fact that with Savile having such an active sex life, why there has been no mention about the possibility of him having produced any offspring who would be entitled to a share in his estate.
Martin wrote:I utterly despise folk who try to convert child abuse into money http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20162980 but let's face it, this is all about money, nothing more, nothing less.
No amount of money could ever compensate for what is done and taken away from a child and anyone who believes otherwise hasn't got a clue what they're talking about.
All these so called "victims" are now chosing to crawl like wee white worms from the woodwork when the man doesn't have a chance to defend himself. If they were so hard done by then they would have shouted from the rooftops when Savile was alive. Sod the excuse that the BBC etc covered things up, the internet was around long before Savile's death and there is no excuse for not shouting this loud and clear and making themselves be heard.
FFS, a slap on a tarts arse now can get a man put on the SOR, but back way back when it was all laughed off and quite rightly so.
I would be very surprised if any abuse ever took place, it's all about money and five mins of fame.
I sincerley hope that this post upsets as many people as possible.
Never forget, I don't give a sh*t !
LANDROVER ROGER wrote:EMDEE wrote:LANDROVER ROGER wrote:Martin has raised the same point with regard to compensation that I tried to make earlier in the thread.I was severely slapped down for it.Ah well.
Exactly what I thought.
I've also been wondering about the fact that with Savile having such an active sex life, why there has been no mention about the possibility of him having produced any offspring who would be entitled to a share in his estate.
His progeny should be easy to recognise.
EMDEE wrote:LANDROVER ROGER wrote:Martin has raised the same point with regard to compensation that I tried to make earlier in the thread.I was severely slapped down for it.Ah well.
Exactly what I thought.
I've also been wondering about the fact that with Savile having such an active sex life, why there has been no mention about the possibility of him having produced any offspring who would be entitled to a share in his estate.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests