Trapper wrote:twas masel! It was actually mainly a rant against darryl broadfoot but they cut aw that out!
Let us see it all then Trapper!
You're quite a regular on there now....keep it up!!
Trapper wrote:twas masel! It was actually mainly a rant against darryl broadfoot but they cut aw that out!
A Horse called Juan Face wrote:Ranald wrote:A Horse called Juan Face wrote:Cant say I agree with you Tranny, if QOS have done all the hard work to get to the final then they deserve all the benefits that come with it, regardless of what it will do to the ranking system. If they change that these little teams will have every right to seek legal advice. You cant take away a prize just because you don't like who wins it.
Being runner-up isn't a prize. That's the kind of attitude that sees teams lose two semi finals.
Thats not exactly what i meant and i think you know it. The prize i was referring to wasnt second place, it was the place in Europe. If the rules state that QOS get into Europe from runnerup place then thats what they deserve. Its not fair to them to change it just because you dont like them. I thought my point was self explanatory actually, but Bitter managed to rally against it.
Ranald wrote:My point was that you don't deserve any reward for being runner-up in anything
Ranald wrote:[
No-one will take it away from Queens this year but the rules are changing for next year. Everyone will know where they stand before the competitions start so it'll be fair enough.
Davie P wrote:Ranald wrote:My point was that you don't deserve any reward for being runner-up in anything
So why reward second, third and fourth place in the league?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests